The Oral Torah versus Replacement Theology
A Guide for Returning 10-Tribers
by
Rabbi Avraham Feld
Copyright 2007 © Kol haTor.org.il
Chapter 1
A Loving glance at you from Above
Throughout the Bible various instances are cited,
likening the relationship between G-d and his people, to
one between husband and wife. Crucial to remember, the
Bible always speaks in the language of man
(anthropomorphisms). Similarly, the Bible uses metaphors
and symbolic language to liken Israel and the Torah to
husband and wife. When immersed deeply in the study of
Torah, and glimpses of spiritual insight are reached, it
is as if a lover is down on the street and looking
longingly upwards, catches a glance of his beloved from
behind the window lattice of a royal tower.
A person came to the court of the holy sage, Rabbi
Mendel of Kotz.
“So, why have you come here?” asked the righteous Rabbi.
“I’ve come all this way to find G-d,” the guest replied.
Then you have wasted time and money. G-d is accessible
to anyone everywhere.” said Rabbi Mendel.
“Then why should I have come?”
“In order to find yourself,” replied the Rabbi, “… to
find yourself.”
We are about to go on a short journey into the realm of
the legitimate keepers of the Torah. Those who put their
minds, hearts, and souls into learning the Holy Torah.
Those who willingly shoulder this task, will discover
great rewards, and will come upon a spiritual landscape
that is both vast and beautiful. The rewards of such a
journey lead to clarity and happiness.
For the returning 10-Triber, along this journey, come
philosophical and physical attacks, one of them being
Replacement Theology, This is the theology which
underlies the reasoning and conviction of those groups
who say to Jews: “Who cares about your ‘man-made’ laws?
The antiquity and continuity of your Written and Oral
Traditions do not matter. G-d has kicked you out of his
Kingdom, tossed you out of the ballpark, thrown you
through the window. We are the New Israel. We are no
longer ‘under the Law’"
To all this, we respond:
”Oops, you missed it. Your continued persistence to
follow in the footsteps of ancient 10-Israel, who
rebelled against the Torah and rejected G-d’s appointed
Guardians of His Torah, (the Jews – Psalm 60:7; Gen
49:10), has obscured one of the main themes of the
Bible to you. ‘Surely, The L-rd has chosen Jacob to be
His, and Israel as His prized possession…..?’ ‘Surely,
the L-rd will not abandon His people, nor forsake His
heritage?” (Psalms 132:13, Psalm 135:14).
In reality, the Torah contains all that is needed in
order to achieve self-awareness - an awareness of what
G-d demands of us. The Torah is whole, all-inclusive and
provides continuous sustenance to those who seek Him.
The same Torah berates us when we sin, but also reminds
us of G-d’s everlasting love and undying patience. G-d
will never turn His back upon His chosen people. No
matter how far they stray, the door of repentance
remains open, allowing the repentant soul to return and
bask in the light and warmth of an all-loving,
all-forgiving G-d. “He, being Merciful, forgives
iniquity, and does not destroy; frequently He turns his
anger away, and does not stir up all His wrath” (Ps.
78:38); “For Thou O L-rd are good and forgiving and
exceedingly kind to all those who call upon You” (Ps.
86:5).
An interesting parable illustrates this concept. It is
said that when Thomas Edison had finished putting the
final touches onto his first light bulb, he requested
from one of his young helpers to carry upstairs the new
fragile bulb. The nervous lad dropped the fragile bulb,
and Edison’s team had to work a full 24 hours more, in
order to make a second bulb. When it was finished,
Edison once again gave it to the very same helper who
had dropped the first bulb. He knew that more than a
light bulb was at stake. All the more, so does G-d never
take away His love for, or belief in His chosen people.
They were chosen to receive the Torah and even if they
sometimes drop the light, G-d continues to grant chance
after chance, never giving up, and always leaving open,
the doorway home.
Austin and Mitchell live next door to each other, and
frequently borrow from one another. Austin, however,
was better at borrowing than returning. When Mitchell
came by, one bright day, he said to his neighbor,
“Would you like to put my power drill and work table in
your garage?” “Why would I want you to do that?” asked
Austin?
"Because", said Mitchell, "I like to keep all my tools
in the same place."
When nations borrow from us, fine, but not when they
want to completely replace us. Our sages and our G-d
understood long ago, that there would be those who would
try and claim the Torah as their own, and to our
exclusion.
Moshe asked G-d, “Shall I write it (the Torah) down for
them?” G-d answered, “I chose not to give it entirely in
writing for I foresee a day when they shall be
subservient to other nations, who will then take the
Torah (and claim it as their own)… Therefore, I shall
give the Torah in writing but the Mishnah, Talmud, and
Aggadah shall be transmitted orally, so that even when
they become subservient to other nations, they shall
remain distinct” (Shemot Rabbah 47:1).
Vowels and the Torah
Once a non-Jew asked the great and saintly Shammai: “How
many Torahs do you have?”
“Two,” he answered, “One Oral and one Written, as it
says: These are the statutes and judgments and laws
[Hebrew: “TOROT” (i.e. the plural of Torah], which the
L-rd made between Him and the children of Israel in
Mount Sinai by the hand of Moses” (Leviticus 26:46). The
non-Jewish fellow said, “I believe you concerning the
Written, but not in regards to the Oral Law. Convert me
on condition that you teach me only the Written Law.”
Shammai became indignant and sent him away. The man then
went to the equally great and saintly Hillel who
accepted him for the conversion program. On the first
day Hillel taught the person the alphabet: Aleph, beth,
gimmel, dalet, etc. On the second day Hillel reversed
the letters. The prospective convert disagreed and said:
“Yesterday you taught me a DIFFERENT sequence.” Hillel
answered, “My son, you are relying on me anyway so rely
on me concerning the Oral Torah too”.
In other words we would not know how to pronounce the
Hebrew Alphabet if not for the Oral Tradition. Similarly
in order to understand the Laws we have to rely on Oral
Tradition. Without such a tradition even the Written Law
would not be accessible.
Listen to this my beloved friends, - our Rabbis and
scribes only started putting vowels to Hebrew consonants
between the 6th and 10th centuries of our common era.
This is the opinion of archaeologists today. The
earliest vocalized texts, 895 C.E., are the Cairo
Prophets (Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, Isaiah,
Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and 12 Minor Prophets). The
twenty-four books of the Bible were vocalized in the
Aleppo Codex, 930 C.E., almost ruined in the anti-Jewish
pogroms in 1947. Also, the Leningrad Codex with the
Hebrew Bible was dated at 1000 C.E.
The Torah scrolls received from the Torah’s revelation
at Mt. Sinai, were written without vowels. Throughout
the forty years of wandering in the desert, and even
during the times of the Prophets, the Torah was read and
understood without vowel indicators (The Hebrew alphabet
consists of written consonants only, each of which have
various vowel pronunciations).
How was this possible? Complete, utter and absolute
reliance was on the Oral Tradition. In the case of the
Torah, extra-textural knowledge is crucial to determine
the simple meanings of many texts and elucidation of G-d’s
wishes. Three times, for example, the Bible says not to
cook meat with the three-letter Hebrew word chalav
(milk). Chalav can be just as easily pronounced cheylev
(animal fats). Without any authoritative Oral Law, we
would not know the Divine command was not to cook with
some animal fats. This passed on through many millions
of people having no questions or doubts because of the
clear Oral Bible, which specifies the three letter word
to be chalav - milk.
Rabbi Chaim Shmuelevitz once went to visit his uncle,
Rabbi Avraham Yaffeu, who was the head of the Novhardok
Yeshivah. This Yeshivah was a college of higher Rabbinic
studies that emphasized a particular type of Musar.
“Musar” means “Reproval” and is the name applied to a
rigorous ethical-spiritual movement in the Torah world.
The aim was to hunt out and remove even the slightest
hint of ulterior motivation in the service of God and
humanity. Rabbi Chaim asked the Rosh Yeshivah (i.e.
dean) who amongst his amazing student body was the most
outstanding. Rabbi Chaim first showed him various
brilliant students with high IQs and photographic
memories. He then singled out one boy who was not
absolutely the most brilliant. This young man, said
Rabbi Chaim, is the greatest searcher. Namely he tries
with every fiber of his being to seek out and know G-d’s
words, wisdom and will. He puts all his heart and soul
into this search and so will excel beyond the others.
The student in question became Rabbi Yisroel Kanievsky
(“The Stiepler”) who was renowned for his Torah
scholarship, community concern, and ability to perform
miracles. He passed away only recently. This is the
ongoing tradition that has never ceased.
It is easy to preserve, maintain and faithfully transmit
the Torah because we cherish it so much.
Cherish is the word I use to describe all the feelings
I have, hiding for you inside. You don’t know how many
times I’ve wished that I had told you.
You don’t know how many times I’ve wished that I could
hold you*.
You don’t know how many times I’ve wished that I could
be molded into someone who could cherish you as much as
you cherish me.
And we do cherish you and we do cherish you. Cherish is
the word.“ (Approximately Terry Kirkman). *
”It (the Torah) is a tree of life for those who hold it.
And its supporters are happy” (Proverbs 3:18 ).
Maimonides (Rambam), a world class physician, and
philosopher, a giant of mind and soul, carefully
recorded the generations since the Giving of Torah at
Sinai until his own time 800 years ago. There had passed
only 120 generations. We can even list them exactly.
Using an Aish HaTorah text, the translation of the names
of these spiritual Torch bearers, is as follows
"UNBROKEN CHAIN OF TRANSMISSION "
- Moses
- Joshua 1312 BCE
- THE ELDERS 1260-860 BCE
- Pinchas and the 70 Elders
- Eli the Kohen
- Samuel the Prophet
- King David
THE PROPHETS 860-360 BCE
- Achiya
- Elijah the Prophet
- Elisha
- Yehoyda the Priest
- Zechariah ben Yehoyda
- Hosea
- Amos
- Isaiah
- Micah
- Joel
- Nachum
- Habakuk
- Zephania
- Jeremiah
- Baruch ben Neriah
THE GREAT ASSEMBLY 360-260 BCE
- The Great Assembly consisted of 120 Elders,
including Ezra, Zecharia, Daniel and Mordechai
- Shimon the Tzaddik
TANA’IM – MISHNAIC ERA 260 BCE – 200 CE
- Antigonos of Socho
- Yose ben Yozer, Yose ben Yochanan
- Yehoshua ben Perachiah, Nittai of Arbel
- Yehuda ben Tabbai, Shimon ben Shatach
- Shemaya and Avtalyon
- Hillel and Shamai
- R’Shimon ben Hillel, R’Yochanan ben Zakkai
- Rabban Gamliel the Elder, R’Eliezer ben Hyrcanus,
R’Yehoshua ben Chananiah, R’Shimon ben Netanel, R’Elazer
ben Arakh.
- Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel I, Rebbe Akiva, Rebbe Tarfon,
R’Shimon ben Elazar, R’Yochanan ben Nuri.
- Rabban Gamliel II, Rebbe Meir, Rebbe Yishmael, Rebbe
Yehuda, Rebbe Yose, R’Shimon bar Yochai
- Rabbi Shimon ben Gamliel II
- Rabbi Yehuda the Prince (Codifier of the Mishnah in 190
C.E.)
AMORA’IM – TALMUDIC ERA – 200-500 CE
- Rav, Shmuel, Rabbi Yochanan (Compiler of the Jerusalem
Talmud)
- Rav Huna, Rav Yehuda, Rav Nachman, Rav Kahana, Rabba bar
bar Channa, Rav Ami, Rav Asi
- Rabbah, Rav Yosef, Rav Chisda, Rabba bar Huna
- Abaya, Rava
- Rav Ashi, Ravina (Compilers of the Babylonian Talmud in
500 C.E.)
- And onwards. 120 generations of unbroken transmission up
until today.
Chapter 2
EVIDENCE FOR THE ORAL LAW
When G-d gave the Laws of Booths (Succoth) to Moses
(Leviticus chapter 23), He did not only say you should
dwell in the Succah for 7 days, He also explained what
exactly would comprise a valid Succah; minimum
measurements, suitable vs. unsuitable materials for the
roof, and other necessary details of construction.
However, these measurements and requirements do not
appear in the Written Torah.
Would G-d order you to sit, pray, eat, and sleep in
something, without defining what that something is? As
well as telling Moses what compromises the construction
of a Succah, and what defines dwelling in the Succah, so
G-d also explained to Moses, who exactly was obligated
to dwell in it: Men are obligated to dwell in the
Succah, while women are not. If they do dwell however,
they receive credit for doing so. Likewise, someone in
the middle of a journey is relieved of the obligation to
dwell in a Succah (see Rambam, Introduction to Zeraim).
We have numerous terms, nay - whole instructions, that
are left undefined by the written Torah. We have entire
legal institutions, the basis of whose existence is
derived from the Oral Law. These crucial institutions,
legal categories, practical systems are not clarified,
explained, or elaborated upon in the Written Law. Almost
complete reliance is placed upon the Oral Tradition for
the application, implementations, and specific details (Yehudah
HaLevi, Kuzari 3;35). The indisputable fact is that the
Bible often involves itself with the exceptional
situation rather than with generalizations and
principles. This shows that Scripture relies on other
statements of direction and law.
The Oral Law fulfills this need.
The Bible introduces the Hebrew Civil and Criminal
Statute with this verse: “Now these are the Judgments which thou shalt set before
them” [Exodus 21:1].
The Bible then goes on to the slavery laws:
“If you buy a Hebrew servant, six years he shall serve:
and in the seventh he shall go out free for nothing”
[Exodus 21:2].
What happened to the “Judgments” that had to be set
before them? They were included in the Oral Teaching.
The laws of slavery are discussed without concern to the
issues of individual freedom. These are included in the
Oral Tradition. This is the way of the world and will
always be: Teacher-student, Professor-disciple, Rabbi-Talmid.
Thus in the areas of crafts, dance, martial arts,
history, science, music, arts, information, and
knowledge, etc., there is always vital explanation
passed on through an oral dimension. This oral
transmission is crucial in all fields of endeavor - be
it sheep farming or riding class V rapids. There is a
crucial dimension of oral transmission involved. The
Torah too was passed on by the relationship between
student and teacher. This is the way of the world, the
way God created it and intended for His word to be
passed on.
In antiquity this manner of Oral Tradition was used by
all nations in order to insure the transmission of their
beliefs and spiritual treasures. All of Greek and Roman
law, civil and criminal, as well as codes, culture, epic
poems – all this was transmitted orally. Once something
is written down, it is bound and dated, locked in one
inflexible form, immovable and subject to distortion.
As it is said, “the devil too can quote scriptures”.
Transmission of Oral Law however, protects it from
distortion and insures the preservation of the original
intent and meaning of the Commandments.
The teacher-student relationship insures the benefits of
active learning and dialogue. During oral teaching, a
student can always pause and request his teacher to
elucidate upon an important point. Also important, an
Oral Tradition affords each generation the glorious
challenge of establishing its own intimate relationship
with the Torah’s teachings, practice and wisdom. Thus,
each new generation becomes the key player in
transmitting the tradition to the next generation, and
so on and so forth, this continues on into eternity.
In the distant past, the world operated with simpler
standards and more natural ways. The relationship
between the written texts and the verbal explanation of
these texts was harmonious and in sync with natural
order of things. Theory/abstraction was likewise in a
healthy natural relationship with implementation,
actualization and practice. Therefore the Talmud calls
the Bible, “Mirkra”, i.e. text. The root of this Hebrew
word is “KoRA” which means "read", because the Torah is
read publicly (as heard from Rav Shlomo Riskin, 1972:
Yeshiva University). The word also means to “call” -
because it‘s not really Torah if it doesn’t call out to
you in your practical daily life. Theory must lead to
practice, and those who reject the Oral Tradition are
distorting the divinely created natural order, and
upsetting the perfectly balanced system of transmitting
the heavenly wisdom and will of G-d to humanity. A
healthy, lively system of learning, protects our
precious wisdom, and insures that in every generation
there exist learned men and a system of justice and law
to implement this wisdom.
[Deuteronomy 17:8] “If there arise a matter too hard for
you in judgment, a case of murder, legal rights and
assault, being matters of controversy within your gates:
then shall you arise, and get yourself up into the place
which the L-rd your G-d shall choose;”
[Deuteronomy 17:9] And you shall come unto the priests
the Levites, and unto the Judge then in office, [we have
only the sages of our present day] and enquire; they
shall hold an inquiry and give a decision for you.”
[Deuteronomy 17:10] “You must abide by the decision they
pronounce for you, in that place which the L-rd shall
choose; and you must take care to carry out all their
instructions.”
[Deuteronomy 17:11] “You must abide by the verdict they
give you, and and by the decision they declare to you
swerving neither right nor left of the sentence they
have pronounced for you.”
This is so simple, true, logical, and pure. No field of
activity is devoid of a teaching tradition that involves
some oral communication to clarify and define itself. In
any field if a question arises one naturally goes to the
experts in that field at the time. Our sages and wise
men have been charged with passing on the Oral
Tradition.
The Bible legislates that we maintain a certain amount
of faith and respect for the spiritual leadership of the
sages and judges of our people. Certain religions twist
this sentiment and turn it into ancestor worship.
Judaism does not. The Bible and Talmud state that as
long as people are running G-d’s show on earth, they are
subject to error in certain circumstances of detailed
religious practice. The Bible discusses what to do in
the case of a court that mistakenly legislates for the
application of a certain religious practice. We can work
it out. The biblically ordained system has its checks
and balances. Never the less, the Bible instructs us to
have faith in our spiritual leadership. Whom did Abraham
need to believe in order to take his son on that
covenantal journey and offer him up? He had of course to
believe in G-d. Who did Isaac need to believe in? Isaac
also believed in G-d but he needed in addition to
respect and believe in the integrity, sanity, and wisdom
of his father, Abraham. In every generation we are
bidden to likewise respect and believe in the sages that
will be in our time.
The problem in healing the broken down relationship
between Judah and 10-Israel, lies much with Replacement
Theology. Non-Jewish believers claim themselves the
right to correct the 3000 year old academy of Jewish
Torah experience and to replace it with their new-found
wisdom, which they regard as superior. Historically, and
based on broad generalizing according to the main stream
development of 10-Israel in Exile, the process may be
summarized as follows:
Loss of their Torah identity by the Ten Tribes of Israel
amongst the nations
Their adopting of Christian Messianism with all its
anti-Torah and anti-Judaism teachings, which swept
through the nations, claiming their Divine election and
replacement of Judah (Judaism)
As prophesied, an End-Time Return to Torah by the Lost
Ten Tribes.
It should be self-evident, that this adopted spirit of
‘replacement”, mingled with the ancient in-bred
anti-Judah spirit of the 10 Northern Tribes, and their
zeal to establish their own independent Temple and Holy
City, would not be shed instantly. It should also be
evident, and we in fact observe this in practice, that
across the world today, there is a gradual return to the
realization and acceptance of the need to return to
Rabbinic interpretation of the Torah – which includes
the Oral Torah of Judaism.
“Teach you.” “declare to you” (Deut. 17:11), means Oral
Communication. The Written Law is to the Oral Law like
short notes or a formula are for a lecturer. For those
who have not heard the lecture from the Master, such
notes would be completely useless. Words and marks that
serve those scholars who have heard the lecture, are
instructive guiding stars illuminating the wisdom that
had been taught. These same words and marks stare at the
uninitiated as unmeaning sphinxes.
It also applies, throughout the world, in what is known
as the Common Law, consisting of recorded verdicts of
the past which form a basis and foundation for current
and future law interpretations as required in ongoing
cases and verdicts. The written Law of any country, can
never ever be so broad as to include every possible real
case scenario that comes before the courts. All written
laws require interpretation in order to define its real
implications. The wisdom and truths, known and
appreciated by the diligent student, are sneered at by
the uninitiated, and considered to be merely a clever or
witty play of words, and to contain empty dreams without
any real foundation (Rabbi Samson Rafael Hirsch – Exodus
Commentary 21:2).
In Physics, we have the formula E=mc 2, meaning energy
equals mass multiplied by the speed of light squared.
The volumous explanations of this formula is comparable
to the Oral Tradition that brings the concept down to
the physical world and makes it applicable to everyday
life. To those who are uninitiated and have not heard
the explanation, the short notes or formulae appear to
be mere markings or plays on words.
The Oral Law is in fact expressed in the Written Torah.
If one persists with the right Hebrew language tools
(its rules and structures) he would reveal the Oral Law
deep in the Written Law. The Malbim is an important
source that illustrates this concept. In one of his
texts the Malbim organizes and categorizes the sages’
interpretation on the Book of Vayikra (Leviticus). These
interpretations contain: six hundred and thirteen rules,
two-hundred and forty-eight linguistic principles, and
three hundred and sixty five guidelines for
understanding verbs and synonyms. This shows, that even
if all of Oral Torah was forgotten, using these divine
principles, we could reconstruct the proper
understanding of the written text.
Jews have studied and pondered the Divine words. They
cherished, loved, honored, and revered the Oral and
Written Torah. All this existed centuries before
Christianity or Islam existed, while most of the world
was illiterate and ignorant. Jews have been devoted to
the scrolls and pages of our holy books. These holy
books preserved us as much as we preserved them, binding
together our people throughout the diaspora and across
the generations in exile.
“We’ll be as close as pages in a book, my love and I.
So close that we can share a single look, share every
sigh.
So close that before I hear your laugh, my laugh breaks
through.
And when a tear starts to appear, my eyes grow misty
too.
Our dreams won’t come tumbling to the ground.
We’ll hold them fast Darling,
as the strongest book is bound, we’re bound to last.
our life is my life, and while life beats away in my
heart,
we’ll be as close as pages in a book” .
(Dorothy Fields, Sigmund Romberg, 1944.)
“These are the Statutes and Judgments and Laws [Hebrew:
“Torot” i.e. the plural of Torah], which the L-rd made
between Him and the children of Israel in Mount Sinai by
the hand of Moses” [Leviticus 26:46]. These laws were
given at Sinai to the Children of Israel through Moses.
G-d did not make a Covenant with Israel except by
virtue of the Oral Tradition (Talmud, Gittin 60b). Both
Torahs were communicated by the same prophets, and
derived from the same source. The Torahs are the words
of G-d that in part were written in the Bible, and in
part exist in the authoritative statements of the
righteous teachers of the Oral Tradition (Hoffman, Die
Erste Mischna, Berlin, 1882, p. 3).
Jewish leaders of scholarship and piety were blessed in
having Divine Inspiration (“So they not err in Judgment”
Midrash Leviticus Rabah 29). This tradition existed from
time immemorial and will continue into the future. The
Bible set up a system to deal with the possibility of
error on the part of the elders and sages. Judaism never
claimed infallibility for its spiritual leaders and
Rabbis (Rabbi Dr. Jacobovots, “Journal of a Rabbi”, NY
1966). This system has always worked and always
protected the integrity, truth, and faithfulness of our
traditions. We were never left adrift in the ocean
without sexton or compass. G-d in His wisdom gave us a
Torah that would stand the test of time and the
vicissitudes of Exile and persecution, of redemption,
and return.
Indeed, dear Friends, any objective view of the
Scriptures would yield much evidence that an Oral
Tradition was the mode of transmission from parents to
children. “And you shall teach them diligently your
children” [Deuteronomy 6:7]. This means that the teacher
must clarify the axioms with decisiveness and not allow
the listener to remain in doubt. The Hebrew word
translated as TEACH THEM DILIGENTLY is derived from the
root “ShNeH” that connotes the meanings of "the number
two, repeat, and teach". From this we learn that the
Oral and Written Law must be taught not once but over
and over again. Before telling us to teach our children
diligently the Torah says, “These Words will be upon
your heart” [Deuteronomy 6:7]. This means that we can
teach diligently only if we are ourselves convinced in
our own hearts that the Torah is true and is the right
way of life (Sforno, Rabbi Don Yistchak Abarbanel, Rabbi
Moshe Alshik). It has always been the students, the
Torah bearers, who received the most support in
religious communities, not the athletes or entertainers.
The Talmud teaches that in comparison to a host of good
deeds, the study of Torah is equal to them all (Talmud
Shabbos 127a). Where is it written that Torah must be
taught until we know it fluently? The Torah says, “That
the L-rds Law may be in your mouth” [Exodus 13:9]. This
also connotes the Oral Transmission. From where do we
know that the teacher must also explain the reasons
behind the Torah? Exodus 21:1 says, “These are the
Ordinances that you shall put before them”. The Hebrew
expression “put before them” implies something similar
to a table spread out with food ready to be partaken of.
“And you shall teach them diligently to your children”
[Deuteronomy 6:7]. Teach them to your children? That’s a
mouthful! Even G-d couldn’t keep his first two from
breaking some rules. This is really important; you had
better teach your kids kindness; they might be the ones
to choose your nursing home! G-d directed that the Torah
be transmitted to future generations by means of Oral
teachings. Every age has a next generation; so the
generation that was freed from Egypt and received the
Torah has a next generation until the end of time. [Deuteronomy 6:7] “You shall teach them diligently unto
your children”. These are your students, ergo, the
relationship between teacher and student is like that
between parent and child, and the relationship to fellow
pupils, is like that to siblings.
[Deuteronomy 6:7] :And you shall teach them diligently
unto your children and shall talk of them when you sit
in your house, or walk abroad, at your laying down or at
yourrising.”
A substitute Rabbi in an elementary school yeshiva
opened class by telling his students, that they could
feel at ease with him, as they would with their father.
To which piped up one of his small charges, “Can I have
a dollar then, Dad?”
G-d commands us to speak of the words of the Holy Torah
when you sit in your house, walk by the way, when you
lie down and when you rise up. This is a major priority
of the Bible, namely its transmission to the present and
future generations. The first blessing given to a child
is that they grow up in Torah, to marry, and do good
deeds. The minute Torah learning slowed down,
acculturation and assimilation grew rampant. When a
Jewish town stopped learning Torah they vanished. We
also believe that the State’s military prowess is
ultimately determined according to the number of
children chirping like little birds in the study house
of Torah learning. Once, G-d forbid, they are
interrupted, then we are open to physical annihilation
by the enemy. To paraphrase Rabbi Emmanuel Feldman in
‘On Judaism’: “Beyond all the good, rational reasons,
Torah is the mysterious bridge connecting the Jew with
G-d and by extension all of humanity.”
Through the Torah we interact and communicate. This is
the means by which G-d fulfills His covenant with His
people, to sustain and protect them.
Chapter 3
THE JEWISH SAGES – GIANTS OF MIND AND SPIRIT
The sages of our Oral Tradition had impeccable
character. They were honest, wise, devoted,
compassionate, and good hearted. Look at some of the
qualities demanded of them:
[Deuteronomy 16:18] “JUDGES AND OFFICERS SHALT THOU
MAKE THEE IN ALL THY GATES, WHICH THE L-RD THY G-D
GIVETH THEE, THROUGHOUT THY TRIBES: AND THEY SHALL JUDGE
THE PEOPLE WITH JUST JUDGMENT.” [Deuteronomy 16:19] “THOU SHALT NOT WREST JUDGMENT;
THOU SHALT NOT RESPECT PERSONS, NEITHER TAKE A GIFT: FOR
A GIFT DOTH BLIND THE EYES OFTHE WISE, AND PERVERT THE
WORDS OF THE RIGHTEOUS.” [Deuteronomy 16:20] “THAT WHICH IS ALTOGETHER JUST SHALT
THOU FOLLOW, THAT THOU MAYEST LIVE, AND INHERIT THE LAND
WHICH THE L-RD THY G-D GIVETH THEE.”
Josephus said, thousands of Jews declared their
readiness to be trampled upon by Roman cavalry rather
then accept symbols of a man’s divinity –as ordered by
Caligula. Refusing to relinquish the belief in the
absolute unity of G-d, the Jewish sages in lead of the
ordinary folk suffered martyrdom. As Fuerst points out
in “The worldwide Roman Empire,” it was the Jews alone
who refused to pay homage to the “divinity” of Caligula.
Their tenacity saved the honor of the human race.
Throughout history the Rabbis have defended the Unity of
G-d against pollution, be it the Gnostic or Zoroastrians
who claimed a duality of the godhead, or the doctrine of
three in one (Dr. J. H. Hertz).
We have profound Sinaitic principles for explaining the
Torah. These principles have been listed in the name of
Rabbi Yishmael son of Rabbi Elisha. Rabbi Yishmael was a
colleague of Rabbi Akiva, of Israelite and convert
stock. Both died as martyrs.’ If it were not for these
principles, we could not understand the plain meaning of
Scripture. We need them to understand the clear
directions of God’s Will, Commandments, and Love.
“An Eye for an Eye”?
You know what they say: Where you have two Jews, you
have three opinions. Yet for the next Biblical study
session, all Jews, at all times, scholars and laymen,
understood the above Biblical verse to mean just one
thing. We are talking about the principle of Lex
Talionis (Exodus 21, Leviticus 24), none other than one
of the most misunderstood concepts in the entire Bible,
the legal category of an eye for an eye. Not a single
disagreement exists among 2,000 saintly Rabbis of the
Talmud. All agree, that in every single application or
instance of injury, it means monetary compensation only.
Not a single, solitary case was ever decided in any
other way. If you would charge that we are changing in
any way the Law of the written Torah, then why did we
not, long ago, change the actual written text as well?
Simply because, the holy text on its own, shows without
a shadow of a doubt, that there is no other possible
interpretation. Let me remind us, that the book of
Leviticus 24:22, says clearly, “You shall have one law,
the stranger shall be as the citizen, for I am the L-rd
your G-d.” This verse eloquently concludes a section
that deals with personal injuries. If we were to say
that ‘an eye for eye’ calls for exact retribution, then
the Torah’s requirement for one law would make no sense.
What on earth would you do if a blind person blinded
someone, or if a disabled person disabled someone? You
could not fulfill the literal injunction of eye for eye,
foot for foot! The fact is, eye for an eye, is simply a
Biblical classification, a divine technical legal term,
for just compensation. Look throughout the entire Bible
if you will; the term "tachat" means "instead of",
"below", or "underneath", but it does not mean for. If
the Bible wanted us to take this verse in it’s most
external superficial way, it would have written ayin
b’ayin, the “b “ meaning "for", and not "ayain tachat
ayin" as it is actually written in the text.
Don’t forget to look at the clear prohibition of
accepting money – compensation for malicious murder. “Ye
shall take no ransom for the life of a murderer”
(Numbers 35:31). You see, for anything less than murder,
compensation is in order. You can’t take ransom for the
life of a murderer, but you do take compensation for
injury to bodily organs. The Torah asks for compensation
that would not be accomplished by merely damaging the
offender. If my eye was 20/40, and yours 20/20; if mine
was the hand of a piano player and yours is not, it
would not be a fair exchange. Clearly the impossibility
of literal application is obvious.
The language is such
to convey a moral standard, namely, the enormity of
causing personal injury and it is as if you should lose
your corresponding body part. If the Torah had only
written “monetary compensation,” we might think that
just as in the case of someone who kills his neighbor's
animal, pays up and is then free from any other
punishment, likewise one who injures another person and
pays is also free from further obligation. This is not
the case however. He must still ask for forgiveness, and
seek atonement from the injured party (Maharal). The
Torah never tires from making statements in the written
text, that set moral standards. The practical
application is to compensate and make good, not to
create more pain and loss in the community. The actual
Hebrew shows this by using a term that means to
complete, make peace, make up and compensate.
We mentioned earlier that the word "tachat" in the
expression ‘eye for an eye,’ means "instead of",
"under," or "beneath". There is a deeper level of
meaning that can be gleaned from studying the exact
words used in the Torah. The letters which spell the
word “eye” in Hebrew are Ayin, Yod, and Nun ( עין ).
These letters each come “beneath” or fall exactly behind
the letters Caf, Samech and Fey in the Hebrew alphabet.
(In the order of the Hebrew alphabet Yod is directly
followed by Caf, Nun is followed by Samech, and Ayin is
followed by Fey).
What do Caf, Samech and Fey spell?
The three letter word for money - CeSeF(C-S-F-)!
This once again shows the literal intention of the
Scriptures to be monetary compensation. This concept
also applies to the Biblical phrase, ‘life for life.’
Look at the parallel verse: [Leviticus 24:18] – “HE THAT
SMITETH A BEAST MORTALLY SHALL MAKE IT GOOD ‘LIFE FOR
LIFE’.” Again, this simply means fair compensation,
otherwise anyone who killed an animal would have to
forfeit his life in return. To take away all doubt as to
the intent of this technical legal term ‘life for life,’
the same paragraph [Leviticus 24:21] says, “HE THAT
KILLS A BEAST SHALL MAKE IT GOOD; AND HE THAT MURDERED A
MAN SHALL BE PUT TO DEATH.”
This concept is paraphrased clearly by the following
source (Torah Kohanim Baba Kama 84):
“I might think that if a man blinded his fellow man, he
too should be blinded, or if he cut off the hand of his
fellow man, his hand should be cut off….We are therefore
taught (by the juxtaposition of the verses) that
damaging another’s animal is comparable to injuring
one’s fellow man; just as one who damages another’s
animal must pay financial compensation, so must one who
injures another man.”
Notice that the concept of an eye for an eye, is
classified in the section of law dealing with accidental
injuries. The verses preceding the text of “eye for an
eye,” deal with intentional assault. In these cases
however, the Torah does not call for any exact
retribution relative to the damages. Therefore, if the
term 'eye for an eye' was misunderstood as being
literal, we would have to conclude that according to the
Torah, accidental damages and injury is much worse that
premeditated, intentionally inflicted injury.
The sages regard eye and tooth merely as typical
examples of damages. They also list twenty-four other
bodily organs that fall under the same legal
classification and jurisdiction. In computing
compensation, the actual damage, loss of time, cost of
cure, pain, disfigurement, and embarrassment, are all
taken into consideration (Hertz Pentateuch). The jist of
it is, “SHALL MAKE IT GOOD, HE SHALL GIVE MONEY” [Exodus
21:34].
To paraphrase Rabbi Dr. Hertz (the late Chief Rabbi of
the British Empire), nothing can illustrate the
difference between ancient legal systems better than the
application of the law of talion (“eye for an eye”).
Today the evocation of life for life, etc., is
recognized as one of the far-reaching steps in human
progress. It has always meant the substitution of legal
due process in place of wild revenge. One eye not two,
one tooth not ten, one life not a whole family. For the
founders of International Law – Hugo Grotius, Jean
Bodin, and John Seldan – all maintain that ‘eye for an
eye’ enjoins that a fair and equitable relation must
exist between the crime and the punishment, and that all
citizens have merit before the law. John D. Michaelis
(pioneer of Modern Bible Exegesis) said, “This rule is
appropriate for free peoples, in which the poorest
member has the same right as his most aristocratic
assailant. The tooth of the poor peasant is as valuable
as the nobleman’s, even if the peasant must bite crust
while the nobleman eats cake.” Professor W.E. Allbright
(a biblical archaeologist), states this as being a
revolutionary concept of law. In ancient jurisprudence,
men of power would pay a fine, even for the most heinous
of crimes, or they would destroy the entire clan of the
offender. Judaism’s ‘eye for an eye,’ set a new
precedent of equal justice for all.
Laws and Legal Principles of Biblical Interpretation
"Even More So"
Come let us learn together for a while and discuss some
of the principles that serve as laws of Exegesis. One of
these ancient principals is as follows: an inference
(conclusion) can be made from a minor premise (lenient
law) to a major premise (strict law) and vice versa.
This concept in Hebrew (a very precise and beautiful
language) is communicated in two words: “Kal veChomer”,
i.e. "Judgement from a Lenient Case Extrapolated to a
More Serious One". Now say, for example, we have an act
that is forbidden on a regular festival (holiday). It
would then be so much more forbidden on a special
stricter holiday such as The Day of Atonement (Yom
Kippur). Likewise, if a certain action is permissible on
Yom Kippur then so much more so should it be permitted
on an ordinary festival.
"Key Words and Expressions"
Let us discuss another important rule of Exegesis. When
similar words and phrases appear in different places and
separate contexts it can be inferred that what is meant
in one passage, can clarify and be applied to the other.
This rule of logic is succinctly expressed by the two
Hebrew words: “Gezera Sheva”. The following enable us to
see these legal concepts at work. For example, the verse
fragment concerning a “Hebrew slave” [Exodus 21:2] is
unclear.
“IF THOU BUY A HEBREW SERVANT, SIX YEARS HE SHALL SERVE:
AND IN THE SEVENTH HE SHALL GO OUT FREE FOR NOTHING”
[Exodus 21:2].
This could conceivably apply to a pagan slave owned by a
Hebrew or to an Israelite slave owned by a fellow
Israelite. It cannot however, apply to both. We only
know that this refers to the case of a Israelite slave
because of the similar phraseology used in Deuteronomy
in reference to “your Hebrew brother”.
“AND IF THY BROTHER, AN HEBREW MAN, OR AN HEBREW WOMAN,
BE SOLD UNTO THEE, AND SERVE THEE SIX YEARS; THEN IN THE
SEVENTH YEAR THOU SHALT LET HIM GO FREE FROM THEE”
[Deuteronomy 15:12 ].
This is the same case as that in Exodus 21:2 and here it
clearly refers to “your brother, a Hebrew man.” Thus the
two verses clarify each other.
APPLICATION OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Extrapolation
Another legal concept states that a general principle
learned from one or two Biblical verses, is similarly
applicable to related laws. For example:
[Deuteronomy 24:6] NO MAN SHALL TAKE THE NETHER OR THE
UPPER MILLSTONE TO PLEDGE: FOR HE TAKETH A MAN'S LIFE TO
PLEDGE.
We are told here that no man should take a hand mill or
millstone [general rule] to pledge [as security for a
loan/debt] for he would be taking a life [livelihood] in
pledge. This Sinaitic rule of logic would dictate that
generally, the just established principal applies to all
similar issues. The conclusion of the Rabbis therefore,
is that everything that is necessary for the preparation
of food is forbidden to be used as a pledge.
The Torah says that a man cannot marry the daughter of
his mother by another father i.e. maternal half sister
(Leviticus 18:9, Deuteronomy 27:22). There is also a law
against marrying the sister of your father (Leviticus
18:12). The general principle by extrapolation demands
that the law against marrying your maternal half sister
applies to the maternal half sister of your father.
The Torah says that if a man strikes the eye or knocks
out the tooth of his slave he must let him go free
(Exodus 21:27). Based on the above principle of
application to related cases the Rabbis concluded
whenever any part of the body of a slave is mutilated by
the master then the slave must be set free.
Contextual Harmonization
Now let us examine one more of the more simple rules of
Biblical exposition. Two similar passages that
contradict one another can be harmonized by a third
passage that reconciles the first two. In Genesis 22:2,
Abraham is told to offer up his son. God however had
already told Abraham that his son Isaac would become a
great nation (Genesis 21:12). The answer is that the
command was to place Isaac as an offering but not to
slaughter him. The literal Hebrew said merely to raise
him up, and then Avraham was ordered to lower him down.
Thus there was no contradiction.
In Exodus 13:6, the Israelites are told to eat
unleavened bread for seven days whereas in another verse
they are told six days: [Deuteronomy 16:8] “SIX DAYS
THOU SHALT EAT UNLEAVENED BREAD: AND ON THE SEVENTH DAY
SHALL BE A SOLEMN ASSEMBLY TO THE L-RD THY G-D: THOU
SHALT DO NO WORK THEREIN. “
To solve the problem of this apparent contradiction all
that is needed is the application of the exegetical
principal stated earlier (a third verse can reconcile
two apparently contradictory verses). Here is the
reconciliatory third verse:
[Leviticus 23:14] “AND YE SHALL EAT NEITHER BREAD, NOR
PARCHED CORN, NOR GREEN EARS, UNTIL THE SELFSAME DAY
THAT YE HAVE BROUGHT AN OFFERING UNTO YOUR G-D: IT SHALL
BE A STATUTE FOR EVER THROUGHOUT YOUR GENERATIONS IN ALL
YOUR DWELLINGS.” [Leviticus 23:15] “AND YE SHALL COUNT UNTO YOU FROM THE
MORROW AFTER THE SABBATH, FROM THE DAY THAT YE BROUGHT
THE SHEAF OF THE WAVE OFFERING; SEVEN SABBATHS SHALL BE
COMPLETE:”
This is the law of new produce. It was forbidden to eat
new grain of the season until the second day of Passover
(called “Sabbath” on the verse Leviticus 23:15 above)
when the Omer barley offering was sacrificed. Here lies
the reconciliation between the apparent contradiction
regarding the observance of seven days rather than six
days. If the unleavened bread (matzah) was made of new
grain it could only be eaten on six days of the Passover
week. Therefore the verse in Exodus 13:6 about eating
unleavened bread for six days refers to unleavened bread
made from new grain.
In another example of the same principle can be applied
to the following. In Exodus 19:20 the verse states that
G-d came down:
[Exodus 19:20] AND THE L-RD CAME DOWN UPON MOUNT SINAI ,
ON THE TOP OF THE MOUNT: AND THE L-RD CALLED MOSES UP TO
THE TOP OF THE MOUNT; AND MOSES WENT UP.
In Exodus 20:22 however, it says that G-d spoke from
heaven:
[Exodus 20:22] AND THE L-RD SAID UNTO MOSES, THUS THOU
SHALT SAY UNTO THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL, YE HAVE SEEN THAT
I HAVE TALKED WITH YOU FROM HEAVEN.
Deuteronomy makes peace between the two versions by
explaining that out of heaven did He make his voice
heard in order to take you under the bond of His
discipline, and then on the earth, He let be seen His
great fire from the midst of which you heard His words.
Here is the conciliatory verse:
[Deuteronomy 4:36] “OUT OF HEAVEN HE MADE THEE TO HEAR
HIS VOICE, THAT HE MIGHT INSTRUCT THEE: AND UPON EARTH
HE SHEWED THEE HIS GREAT FIRE; AND THOU HEARDEST HIS
WORDS OUT OF THE MIDST OF THE FIRE.”
These are but a few simple examples of how the Written
Torah is predicated on the logical rules of exegesis
contained in the Oral Torah. The same Oral Torah also
explains how its rules are to be utilized. No one has
authority to use these principles in just any old way.
The Oral Torah saves us from gross violation of G-d’s
true intentions. For example, the true understanding and
practical literal application of the concept “eye for an
eye,” is equal and fair monetary compensation. Dr.
Travers Herford in his comprehensive book Talmud and
Apocrypha, explained that the concept of an eye for an
eye was metaphorical, and such a punishment was never
inflicted. This policy is clearly felt, and understood
by any student with a sensitive understanding of the
Torah and its texts as a whole. Only through the
guidance of the Oral Tradition can this sensitivity be
protected and nurtured.
The Written Torah would be comparable to hard earth and
all the fruit and vegetables from which it grows, are
comparable to the Oral Torah. The Written law appears
fixed, rigid, unchanging. The Oral Law is moving, alive,
dynamic, and flexible. It has the potential to
categorize, define, analyze, adjust, and to apply the
Torah’s principles to each new generation. The Written
Law is similar to the magnificent skeleton of the human
body. The Oral Tradition fills out the body, gives skin,
eyes, and hair-coloring, personality and healthy body
systems. The Oral and written tradition together is what
makes the Hebrew people and their Bible together the
longest living faith. It exemplifies the Covenant that
is in a continual state of renewal and rejuvenation. The
purpose of the tension inspired by dynamic ongoing
debate, is to reveal G-d’s Will, Desires and Drectives.
Thus is depicted the excitement of the ongoing
revelations and dialogue between G-d and Israel .
There is much evidence for the antiquity of the Oral
Tradition. A Mishna in Negaim occupies itself with a
person afflicted by "Tsarat" [tanslated as "leprosy" but
referring to a special spiritually-generated type of
disease that broke out before the monumental revelation
at Sinai]. The Mishna lays down the law that in such a
case those particular signs of "leprosy" did not make a
person ritually unclean, even after the revelation at
Sinai.
We have laws in the Mishna which only make sense and
were relevant to the times before the Land was conquered
and settlement commenced. One such example, is the
question of inheritance in the case of the daughters of
Zelophehad from the Tribe of Manasseh (Numbers 27:1).
The Mishna said they had rights to the portion of both
their father and grandfather. [The land was split up
according to the families that went out of Egypt – upon
their death their immediate descendants – usually sons -
inherited their portions]. This is Oral Law at the very
beginning of Israelite History. Another example is the
prohibition of orlah (which limits the use of trees
before their fifth year, Leviticus 19:24) and how it
influenced the Israelite settlers. The Mishna decreed
that in the case of the already planted (by the
Caananites) trees encountered by the first Israeli
settlers, the law did not apply.
Another interesting example was the arguments and
debates about the six cities of refuge where accidental
manslayers could stay and be rehabilitated, safe from
the harm of retribution and revenge (Numbers chapter
35). The six cities were divided such that there were
three on each side of the Jordan River. The Mishna
provided necessary details of instruction, such as when
the status of refuge came into effect. Even though three
cities were already set up on the east side in the time
of Moses, they only went into operation when all the six
cities had been established (Makot 3b).
As with the example of an eye for an eye, all of our
important institutions assume the existence of an Oral
Torah. The written law never stood alone. It was always
accompanied and elucidated by the Oral Torah. This does
not require a leap of faith, but merely looking over the
Torah, one is immediately struck with the absolute
necessity for the Oral Law.
We see how the Oral Teaching was delivered, functioning,
and cleaning up issues from the dawn of Jewish history.
Thus the Oral Tradition clarifies difficulties in
understanding and implementing the Biblical words from
the earliest times of manhood. The Oral Law would not
need to legislate and enact laws that applied to
situations that were not in existence. No one would need
a legal enactment for folk with leprosy even before the
Torah was revealed, except for the real people and their
families immediately affected at that time. We see that
the teachings which came to us from the Mishna of the
Sages have identical date and origin with that which is
derived by interpretation of the Scriptural Word. All is
given by the One G-d and communicated by the one same
Prophet Moses - Moses, and thereafter the Elders,
Prophets, Sages, down to our own times. The principles
by which the Sages in future generations deduced the
laws applicable to any generation (Sifra, Behar, Exodus
Rabah 41).
Rabbi Akiva asks, “Did Moses learn the whole Torah?” To
which he replies, “No.” G-d only needed to teach him the
principles.
Chapter 4
LAWS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES OF BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION
The survival of the Jewish people is a mysterious and
wonderful phenomenon, demonstrating that the life of
this nation is governed by a higher special process
transcending the processes of adaptation expanded by
materialistic interpretations. To paraphrase Professor
Nicholai Berdyaev (The Meaning of History, London,
Moscow Academy of Spiritual Culture, 1936), the Jewish
people and the Jewish Torah’s survival seems absolutely
inexplicable. All of this points to the particular and
mysterious foundations of their destiny. Scientific
criticism, applied to traditional Biblical history, can
neither discredit the universal role played by the Jews,
nor offer a satisfactory explanation of their mysterious
destiny. Nor does this criticism grapple with their
extraordinary intense feeling for history.
As Blaise Pascal said, “This people are not eminent
solely by their antiquity, but are also singular by
their devotion, which has always continued from their
origin, until now. In spite of all the endeavors of many
powerful kings who have a hundred times tried to destroy
them, as their historians testify, they have
nevertheless been preserved (and this preservation has
been foretold), their history comprehends in its
duration, all our histories.”
Ellis Rivkin points out in his The Dynamics of Jewish
History, “In any given century, Jews would be living
simultaneously in as many as three or four radically
different societies, each of which demanded a
distinctive form of Jewish adaptation if survival was to
be sustained. Not only was this challenge met, but it
was met without annulling a distinctive Jewish
identity.”
This continuity was made possible by the unique
combination of meshing of the Oral and Written Torah.
“YOU ARE THE ONES WHO HAVE BEEN SHOWN SO THAT YOU WILL
KNOW,” says the Torah, “THAT G-D IS THE SUPREME BEING
AND THERE IS NONE BESIDES HIM” [Deuteronomy 32:40]. The
same chapter links this personal G-d with a practical
transmission.
You might inquire about times long past, going back to
the time that G-d created man on earth, exploring one
end of the heavens to the other, see if anything as
great as this has ever happened. G-d related and relates
to His people within history and through His Torah. A
living process of transmissions highlighted here and
there with miracles. “REALIZE IT TODAY AND PONDER IN
YOUR HEART: G-D IS THE SUPREME BEING IN HEAVEN ABOVE AND
ON EARTH BENEATH – THERE IS NO OTHER. KEEP HIS DECREES
AND COMMANDMENTS THAT I AM PRESENTING TO YOU TODAY”
[Deuteronomy 4:39-40]. Decrees and Commandments that are
to be kept in a real time practical way; the only way
was, and is, with a living Oral Torah explanation
enabling us to do so.
Much of the reasons for Christian rejection of the Oral
Torah, may lie in the fact that Christianity sees
religion as a spiritual exercise only – much of it tied
to the Church and for Sundays only. In Judaism, the
Bible and its Laws is like a national constitution. It
is for running and controlling the daily life and needs
of a vibrantly active nation and its country.
Groups arose and disappeared, which rejected Judaism and
its guardianship of the Oral Tradition. Still, they were
at their wits ends to apply the Written Law without the
Oral Law, and had to invent their own version. They did
indeed, and each and every one of them admitted to the
absolute necessity of the Oral Tradition, but merely
rejected the age old commitment, devotion, and
transmission of the sages.
The current re-awakening of the Lost Ten Tribes in exile
amongst the nations, to their original ‘Hebraic Roots’,
have experienced a gradual return to Torah and with
that, to Jewish religious custom and practice. If this
is part of the Prophetic Process of Return foretold by
the Bible Prophets, then it also includes an eventual
Return to the Promised Land of Israel – and hence, a
practical ‘national’ System of Law. Replacement theology
though, inspires these Returnees to claim interpretation
of the Written Bible Laws for themselves, by their own
authority. Much as they reject Rabbinic authority and
its Oral Law as ‘man-made’, they do not realize that
they are simply installing and creating their own new
‘Oral’ interpretation! It does not need intensive
analyzing to determine which of the two Law Systems are
the most authentic and experienced.
Rabbi Tuvia Singer’s insightful tapes point out that
folk who have not had the opportunity to learn about the
Oral Torah, sometimes say it’s an invention of the
Rabbinic Sages. To say the righteous Sages have invented
something foreign and have no authority regarding the
Bible, is like saying the Jewish Israelis occupying
Jerusalem are foreign and invented their authority over
the city. Jewish Israelite presence in Jerusalem is an
expression of Biblical truth and G-d’s desire. Just as
the elders, Rabbis, scribes, and sages of the Oral Torah
express Biblical truth and G-d’s Desire.
The Christian world lost complete contact with the Oral
Law for a host of reasons. Firstly, because the early
Church, after the council of Nicea, had no access to the
Oral Tradition in terms of their total lack of schooling
and experience. Hence, since they were lacking access,
they demonized it and rejected it. They also never even
tried, according to their theology, to fulfill the
Written Bible. Without an attempt to keep the written
laws, there arose no need to understand in depth, how to
apply the various written laws. The Lost Ten Tribes
however, according to tradition and the Bible, will
return and will keep the Law.
Chapter 5 PROTECTING THE BIBLE INJUNCTIONS WITH FENCING
Daniel and other outstanding, brilliant, young Jews were
recruited by Nebuchadnezzar to be trained to serve
Babylon. The King sent the finest foods and drinks for
these up and coming scholars, but they could not eat or
drink of this kingly spread. Why? It was not pork or
shellfish. There is however, a general Rabbinic
prohibition not to eat Gentile produced food that had no
Jewish supervision. Otherwise one could not know for
sure that some non-kosher ingredients were mixed with
permitted foods. In addition to Biblically ordained laws
of Kashrut which deal specifically with permitted and
non-permitted categories of food, the Rabbis proclaimed
further eating restrictions that had nothing to do with
food categories, but rather with matters of
assimilation. Daniel and others kept to these decrees
that forbade drinking wine with Gentiles and eating
bread baked by Gentiles. These social barriers were put
up in order to discourage and inhibit assimilation and
intermarriage. These are non-Biblical, strictly
protective Rabbinic decrees, which Daniel and friends
kept, even at risk to their very lives. Daniel and
friends and the nation of Israel have been guided by the
same Torah injunction.
[Deuteronomy 17:8] “IF THERE BE A MATTER CONCEALED FROM
THEE IN JUDGMENT, BETWEEN BLOOD AND BLOOD, BETWEEN
DECISION AND DECISION, AND BETWEEN PLAGUE AND
PLAGUE, (EVEN) MATTERS OF CONTROVERSY WITHIN THY GATES,
THEN THOU SHALT ARISE, AND GET THEE UP UNTO THE PLACE
WHICH THE L-RD THY G-D SHALL CHOOSE.”
[Deuteronomy 17:8] “AND THOU SHALT COME UNTO THE PRIEST
THE LEVITES, AND UNTO THE JUDGE THAT SHALL BE IN THOSE
DAYS;”
[Even if he is not like other judges who were before
him, you must listen to him; you have only the judge of
your own time (Talmud, Rosh HaShanah 25)]
“AND THOU SHALT INQUIRE; AND THEY SHALL DECLARE UNTO
THEE THE SENTENCE OF THE JUDGMENT.”
[Deuteronomy 17:10] “AND THOU SHALT DO ACCORDING TO THE
TENOR OF THE SENTENCE, WHICH THEY SHALL DECLARE UNTO
THEE FROM THAT PLACE WHICH THE L-RD SHALL CHOOSE; AND
THOU SHALT OBSERVE TO DO ACCORDING TO ALL THAT THEY
SHALL TEACH THEE.”
[Deuteronomy 17:11] “ACCORDING TO THE LAW WHICH THEY
SHALL TEACH THEE, AND ACCORDING TO THE JUDGMENT WHICH
THEY SHALL TELL THEE, THOU SHALT DO; THOU SHALL NOT TURN
ASIDE FROM THE SENTENCE WHICH THEY SHALL DECLARE UNTO
THEE (TO THE) RIGHT (HAND), NOR (TO THE) LEFT.”
[Deuteronomy 17:12] “AND THE MAN THAT DOETH
PRESUMPTUOUSLY, ON NOT HEARKENING UNTO THE PRIEST THAT
STANDETH TO MINISTER THERE (BEFORE) THE L-RD THY G-D, OR
UNTO THE JUDGE, EVEN THAT MAN SHALL DIE; AND THOU SHALT
EXTERMINATE THE EVIL FROM ISRAEL.”
[Deuteronomy 17:13] “AND ALL THE PEOPLE SHALL HEAR, AND
FEAR, AND DO NO MORE PRESUMPTUOUSLY.”
Take a good look at Daniel 1:3-16. Miracles were
performed for Daniel and his friends because of their
adherence to Rabbinic decrees. The Torah gives the
Rabbinic Sages the power to protect the Torah, to erect
fences around the Torah. Much like a guardrail protects
cars from falling off a highway or into a ravine below,
or as a hedge of roses is to a garden. Numerous times
the Torah says to guard and protect the Torah. Hence the
erecting of protective degrees of Rabbinic origin is in
harmony with Biblical demands. A Rabbinic law made to
protect a Biblical law, is not adding to the Bible. Just
the opposite – it is fulfilling the Biblical injunction
of protecting and guarding the Bible.
The Oral Tradition makes protective degrees to keep Jews
from intermarrying. These included a ban on Gentile
produced wine and cooked foods. Daniel, Chanayah and
Mishael risked their lives rather than transgress
Rabbinic ordinances. Also, in Daniel 3/6-13, Daniel was
found praying three times a day, just as he had done
before – it has something to do with the law. What law?
Not so much Biblical law, but a Rabbinical law
encouraging regular prayer. Yet Daniel, a prophet keeps
it.
There are numerous examples of prophets who observed the
laws of the Oral Torah. The following is a brief review
of a few more. Exodus 20:22 says, “You shall make Me an
alter of stone, but do not build it from hewn stone. If
you lift up your iron tool upon it, you have profaned
it.” Our Oral Tradition said that the rest of the
building stones around the Temple could only be used if
the cutting had not been done at the Temple site. This
is exactly the tradition that the Prophets kept during
the construction of the first Temple (1-Kings 6:7).
In Leviticus 23:10 the Torah, speaking of the Omer waved
offering, says that on the day after the Sabbath the
priest shall wave it. Anybody who is hip to what is
happening, knows that Passover is also called a
Sabbath. Thus the Torah means that the wave offering
should be performed the day after Passover. Going back
to the very dawn of our people, the book of Joshua
(5:11) testifies to the correctness of that explanation.
Likewise, in the Book of Ruth (4:7), we see Oral
Tradition in action. The Talmud teaches the legal
mechanisms for exchange of monies and properties. Then
here in the Book of Ruth we see money used as a vehicle
for transferring ownership of land.
Our sages explain the problem of moving objects into the
city from outside (on the Sabbath), in other words
moving objects from public to private domains and vice
versa. Just take a look in Jeremiah 17:21 and see how
the Prophets upheld the intention of the biblical
Sabbath laws as explained by the Oral Traditions.
Many times the prophets exhorted the people to keep the
non-Biblical laws that emerge from the Rabbinic Oral
prescriptions. As safeguards, these non-Biblical laws
serve to protect, guard, and preserve Biblical laws. All
of our traditions maintain that Divine Inspiration did
not leave the sages. In the texts of the prophets, can
be found discussions relating to the applications of
Torah laws. They support the explanations and
elucidations of cryptic, vague, and otherwise
non-intelligible Biblical commands. Again and again, the
Torah tells us to listen to prophet or sage. Deuteronomy
17:8-11 and Leviticus 26:46 clearly imply there will
always be sages to go to.
Our Oral Tradition tells us that all this was, is, and
shall be, is hidden in the Torah; not only in a general
way, but in a specific way as well. Concerning this
secret Truth, that we are incapable of fully
understanding, the book of Job says, ‘Its measure is
longer than the world.’
[Leviticus 26:46] THESE ARE THE STATUTES AND JUDGMENTS
AND LAWS, WHICH THE L-RD MADE BETWEEN HIM AND THE
CHILDREN OF ISRAEL IN MOUNT SINAI BY THE HAND OF MOSES.
Chapter 6 PROPHETS - KEEPING RABBINIC JUDAISM
Towards the end of the Song of Songs we read, “The
flashes thereof are flashes of fire, a most vehement
flame.” Shalhevet –yah means the very flame of G-d. This
expresses might, sanctity and the endurance of the love
from above for Israel . (Idea first expressed by Prof.
Yehudah Feliks). This is one of many examples of the
passionate relationship between the people and their
Creator and by extension, between the people and His
Torah. Ultimately the light of G-d and His Torah, and
the flame of the holy Torah emanate brightly, touching
the rest of humanity as well.
“I believe it’s meant to be I watch you when you are sleeping ( exile)
You belong to me Do you feel the same? Am I only dreaming?” (Exile similar to dreaming, Psalm 126) Is this burning an eternal flame ?
Say my name Sun shines through the rain…. This burning is indeed an eternal flame! (B. Steinberg, ’88)
Finally, Israel is described as the eternal nation.
Scripture [Genesis 17:7, Leviticus 26:44-45] speaks of
‘ETERNAL BONDS OF DESCENDANTS AFTER YOU.’
(Isaiah 54:10, 54:17) – ‘MY LOVE FOR YOU SHALL NEVER
MOVE.’
[Jeremiah 31:34-35, 46:27-28] – ‘I WILL CORRECT YOU IN
JUST MEASURE, BUT I WILL NOT UTTERLY DESTROY YOU.’
[Malachi 3:6] – ‘FOR I AM G-D, I DO NOT CHANGE. YOU ARE
THE CHILDREN OF JACOB, YOU WILL NOT CEASE TO BE.’
[Deuteronomy 7:6-9, 12] – ‘HE IS G-D, THE FAITHFUL G-D
WHICH KEEPS HIS COVENANT AND MERCY WITH THEM THAT LOVE
HIM AND KEEP HIS COMMANDMENTS… IF YOU HEARKEN (the oral
– listening, ongoing teaching ingredient) TO THESE
JUDGMENTS AND KEEP THEM AND DO THEM, THAT THE L-RD YOUR
G-D SHALL KEEP UNTO YOU THE COVENANT AND THE MERCY HE
SWORE TO YOUR FATHER.’
[Isaiah 59:21] – ‘AS FOR ME, THIS IS MY COVENANT …MY
WORDS WHICH I HAVE PUT IN YOUR MOUTH, [oral
transmission] SHALL NOT DEPART FROM YOUR MOUTH NOR FROM
THE MOUTHS OF YOUR CHILDREN, NOR FROM THE MOUTH OF YOUR
CHILDREN’S CHILDREN,’ says G-d, ‘FROM NOW UNTO ALL
ETERNITY.’
So, who will survive? – so who has survived as
identifiable Jews of today? Only those who have had
absolute Orthodox, Torah true, observant,
great-grandparents. Demographically after 3-4
generations of Jews who have cast aside the Oral Torah,
they simply stop being sociologically Jewish. A fifth
generation doesn’t exist if there were not Torah
keeping, Oral Tradition living relatives. Similar to a
flower that is cut from its roots, the fragrant smell is
retained for a while. Thus we see the Jews who sever
themselves from the living Oral Torah, after a while
stop being Jewish. As individuals, or as part of
breakaway sects, they disappear from the community of
the Jewish people. Many verses describe the eternal
bond between G-d and His people. These verses describe
the bond specifically with those who have kept and will
keep the Oral Torah. In short, only the keepers of the
Oral Law are alive and part of the body of Israel, to
tell of G-d’s requirements to the world.
The world, and specifically the reawakening and
returning Lost 10-Tribers today, should take good note
of this. According to His Divine Mandate to the Jews in
Genesis 49:10, G-d has ensured that the proper
interpretation of His Torah would still be available
until the End Time, when Mashiach will come to rule in
His Kingdom!
Gen. 49:10 “The Scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor
a lawgiver (Mechoqeck) from between his feet, until
Shiloh come; and to him shall the obedience of the
people.”
Psalm 60:7 “Judah is My Lawgiver (Mechoqeck)”.
You would have expected more problems with the Jewish
Oral and Written Torah. [Leviticus 6:46] – “THESE ARE
THE DECREES, THE ORDINANCES AND THE TORAHS THAT G-D GAVE
BETWEEN HIMSELF AND THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL AT MOUNT
SINAI THROUGH MOSES.”
But yet the Gospels, with a 1500 year less history, had
a central Church authority who would not hesitate to
kill. The New Testament is much smaller, lacking an
enormous, beautiful Oral Torah, explaining the Bible,
and has over 200,000 textual arguments. Some of the
codexes have serious theological implications. For
example, several important Christian New Testament
versions only go up to Mark 8. Thus rejecting chapters
that come after Mark 8 as unreliable and
unsubstantiated. Yet look at those branches of
Christianity who make a religion out of the chapters
supposedly to be found later in Mark. Again, for about
1300 years of New Testament existence, the central
authority of the Church made it lethal to tamper with
text and it was willing to bloodily enforce its
decisions. On the other hand, for over 2000 years the
Jews had no such armed and central authority that could
effectively do anything if a scribe decided to change a
text. What would stop a scribe in London, Paris, L.A.,
or Manchuria from altering texts? Nothing, no one; yet
the Rabbinic scribes, on their own, remained loyal to
the teachings of their fathers and mothers. Ergo,
respect for the integrity and honesty of the
torchbearers is certainly in order. Many ancient,
non-Jewish sources recognize the honesty, integrity,
sincerity, and righteousness of the sages of Israel.
We can go on and on, with examples of complex
commandments, the understanding of which was assigned to
the Oral Law. In Numbers 15:37-40 it is stated “HAVE MEN
MAKE TASSELS ON THE CORNERS OF THEIR GARMENTS FOR ALL
GENERATIONS…” What these are and how they are worn and
what they symbolize – all these details are clearly
spelled out in the Oral Bible. For 3350 years, Jews
have been wearing these fringes and have known what they
are; all this because of an oral Sinaitic tradition
explaining the Torah’s shorthand. The Oral Bible brings
color and life to the Biblical painting, making the
Biblical commands possible to fulfill practically, as
they were intended to be.
[Deuteronomy 6:5-9] “AND WRITE THEM ON THE DOORPOSTS OF
YOUR HOUSE AND UPON YOUR GATES…”
What are you to write?
The Magna Carta? The Star Spangled Banner? Who is
authorized to write? How, what, when should it be
written on your gates? What if they are not your
doorposts and gates – you are merely a renter? Here,
again, fulfillment of G-d’s Command predicates reliance
on the Oral Torah. The Oral Torah is a necessity. For
millennia, the Jews never had a doubt as to the Divine
directive. The Mezuza is a feature in Jewish properties.
There is no debate, confusion or subjectivity, because
the Oral Torah filled in the spaces which are not
specified in the Written Torah, regarding: structure,
contents, etc
Deuteronomy 12:25 states that “… YOU MAY SLAUGHTER FROM
YOUR CATTLE AND YOUR FLOCKS THAT THE L-ORD HAS GIVEN YOU
AND AS I HAVE COMMANDED YOU, AND YOU MAY EAT IN YOUR
CITIES ACCORDING TO YOUR HEARTS ENTIRE DESIRE.”
Where however in all of the 24 books of scripture are
the details of ritual slaughter explained?
Where does it explain the words “to slaughter… as I have
commanded you?”
The answer, my friend, is flowing in the Oral Law. Only in
the Oral Torah are we provided with the details of this
Command; i.e. a humane way to slaughter. Interestingly,
the details of the Oral Law pertaining to slaughter,
coincide with a statement from the Encyclopedia
Britannica. According to this article, scientific
opinion indicates that severance of the carotid arteries
and the jugular vein (with the razor sharp ritual knife)
in one swift movement, results in immediate loss of
consciousness. The after struggle is reflex muscular
action alone. It is a very painless way to raise the
animal up spiritually together with everything that went
into the raising of that animal. This takes the animal
to a higher plane, and the human, by consuming its
health imbuing properties, can better live and serve
G-od and humankind. The ancient law stands on
humanitarian high ground when compared to the head
crushing and strangling inflicted on animals through
non-kosher methods of slaughter. Many Rabbinic Torah
authorities even feel that, unless people serve G-d and
use their energy from food consumption for that purpose,
they have no moral right to eat meat. Judaism has led
the world in legislation against animal cruelty and some
of the modern societies for animal protection have been
founded and supported through tradition conscious Jews.
[Leviticus 11:1-8] “BUT THIS IS WHAT YOU SHALL NOT EAT
FROM AMONG THESE THAT BRING UP THEIR CUD OR THAT HAVE
SPLIT HOOVES. THE CAMEL, FOR IT BRINGS UP ITS CUD, BUT
ITS HOOF IS NOT SPLIT. THE SHOFAN, FOR IT BRINGS UP ITS
CUD, BUT ITS HOOF IS NOT SPLIT. THE ARNEVET, FOR IT
BRINGS UP ITS CUD, BUT ITS HOOF IS NOT SPLIT. THE PIG,
FOR HOOF IS SPLIT, BUT IT DOES NOT CHEW ITS CUD…”
The characteristics of permitted animals, are cloven
hooves and the chewing of the cud (rumination). The Oral
Law also points out sweeping characteristics of animals
and nature. Ruminators for instance, never have incisor
teeth in the upper jaw. Also, with the exception of the
camel and its family, all ruminators have cloven hooves.
Likewise, with the exception of the pig, all hooved
animals ruminate. Therefore, says the Oral Tradition, if
you find an animal whose species cannot be identified,
check out its hoofs. If the hoofs are mutilated or
missing, then check out the mouth. If no incisor teeth
are present in its upper jaw, then you can be sure it is
a clean animal species (as long as you can recognize and
rule it out as a camel). If you find an animal whose
mouth has been mutilated, check the hoofs. If they are
cloven, the animal is clean as long as you can recognize
and rule it out as a pig. Zoologists have discovered
over 5,000 different kinds of mammals. Why would the
Bible and Oral Tradition stick its neck out 3,350 years
ago and make such absolute statements regarding the
animal kingdom? Did the scribes and the Rabbis have the
means of the Discovery Channel and National Geographic
to check out every hemisphere, to investigate every nook
and cranny of forest, hill, jungle or prairie? In other
words, asks the Talmud (Chulin 60/b), was Moses a hunter
or an archer (a zoologist)? This refutes those who
maintain that the Torah was not divinely revealed.
It was taught in the Academy of Rebbe Yishmael, the
Torah states, “THE CAMEL SHALL BE UNCLEAN TO YOU,
ALTHOUGH IT CHEWS ITS CUD.” The Ruler of the Universe
knows that the camel chews its cud and yet, it’s impure.
Therefore, the verse specifies it. In other words, the
redactor of the Bible – G-d himself – knew all the
species the zoologists would eventually reveal
throughout history. The same G-d of pure oneness, who
can see the unity of history and nature, could have the
Oral and Written Tradition go out on a limb describing
the wild kingdom without any fear of future
contradictions.
What about fish? You know what kind of cigarettes a
Rabbi smokes? A gefilter cigarette. Fish need fins and
scales in order to be considered Kosher (Leviticus
11:9-10, Deuteronomy 14:9) though microscopic scales are
not included. The Mishna (Nida 6:9) clearly says, “Every
creature that has scales will have fins, but there are
those which have fins but no scales.” The Talmud (Nida
51/b) goes on to say if so, then why did G-d not write
scales and there would be no need to mention fins? Rebbe
Abbahu answered and it was taught in school of Rebbe
Yishmael . "In order to magnify the Torah and make it
glorious" [Isaiah 42:21]. Around 25,000 new species of
fish have been revealed in the last 100 years and all of
them that have fins also have scales and vice versa. How
could the Talmud have been so sure of itself? Because
the information given in the Talmud comes directly from
the very author of life, the expert par excellance on
oceanography and marine biology.
Remember [Isaiah 45:19], also [Exodus 16:29 -30] says,
“LET EVERY MAN REMAIN IN HIS PLACE ON THE SABBATH.” What
does that mean? Do we envision West Side Story – Jets
vs. Sharks. ‘Yo bro don’t leave your turf. Your hood
(neighborhood) is your place and don’t you dare cross
lines into another turf on the Sabbath or else you is
chopped meat.’ The answer is no. The Oral Tradition
spells out what it means not leaving your place. The
Sabbath laws carry with them severest of penalties. So
G-d was exact in what He wanted, but the exactness was
to be found in, yes, you guessed it; the living,
breathing, dynamic Oral Tradition.
[Isaiah 58:13-14] “IF YOU RESTRAIN YOUR FOOT BECAUSE OF
THE SABBATH FROM PERFORMING YOUR AFFAIRS…” What does
this mean? “…AND IF YOU DO RESTRAIN YOUR FOOT…THEN YOU
SHALL FIND DELIGHT WITH THE L-RD…” Perhaps some new
dance step? Do the “Restrain your foot hop.” No such
confusion was left. The earth was null and void only in
Genesis; afterwards the world was to be orderly and
logical. G-d’s natural laws make sense and have logus.
Likewise His spiritual laws have order, logic, and logus
about them. He did not say unintelligible things and
order us to do them and be consequently rewarded or
punished. He gave laws to do and explained what that
meant to us in His Oral Torah. Perhaps we do not
understand His ultimate reason or purpose to a specific
law, but the practical application has always been
intended. Any technical differences are worked out in
terms of application within a system that comes to
proper Biblically anchored conclusions.
Chapter 7 HISTORY – and so …
Michael Drazin in ‘THEIR HOLLOW INHERITANCE’, states
that, clearly, the Oral Tradition must be afforded the
utmost seriousness, for its explanations of Biblical
verses were given to Moses by G-d and have been studied
and cherished for generations. In contrast, during the
glorious Prophetic Era (which lasted one thousand years
– the millennium BCE), while the Israelite people
pondered the profound Divine Messages conveyed by its
prophets, Christians were non-existent and most Gentiles
were illiterate pagans. The Hebrew Bible, with its
revolutionary moral standards, only became known to the
world at a much later date (around 246 BCE).
Nevertheless, the founding fathers of Christianity had
to insist that their interpretations of the Hebrew Bible
were as valid as those of the Jews. But the basis of
theses claims is itself founded on misinterpretations:
[2-Chronicles 34:14] “AND WHEN THEY BROUGHT OUT THE
MONEY THAT WAS BROUGHT INTO THE HOUSE OF THE L-RD,
HILKIAH THE PRIEST FOUND THE BOOK OF THE LAW OF THE L-RD
BY THE HAND OF MOSES.”
The sensational discovery unearthed the Torah Scroll
Moses himself had written (“The Book of the Law”) – not
that there were not an abundance of scrolls – Torah was
being learned and practiced day and night. Merely that
this was particular because of its antiquity and the
very special scribe that worked on it, namely Moses.
[Deuteronomy 31:24-26] ”AND IT CAME TO PASS, WHEN MOSES
HAD FINISHED WRITING THE WORDS OF THE LAW IN THIS
BOOK…THAT MOSES COMMANDED THE LEVITES…SAYING, ”TAKE THIS
BOOK OF THE LAW AND PUT IT BY THE SIDE OF THE ARK OF THE
COVENANT OF THE L-RD, YOUR G-D, THAT IT MAY BE THERE FOR
YOU AS A WITNESS.”
This scroll had been hidden from King Ahaz, who had
destroyed the holy artifacts one hundred years earlier:
[2-Chronicles 28:24] “AND AHAZ GATHERED TOGETHER THE
VESESELS OF THE HOUSE OF G-D, AND CUT IN PIECES THE
VESSELS OF THE HOUSE OF G-D…”
However, when this scroll was unrolled before King
Josiah, he rent his clothes (2-Chronicles 34:19) for it
fell open to the section containing all the curses
destined to befall those Jews who disregard the Torah
(Deuteronomy 27:28).
Huldah the prophetess confirmed Josiah’s conviction that
this was no mere coincidence but an omen from G-d:
[2-Chronicles 34:24-25] “THUS SAYS THE L-RD: “BEHOLD, I
WILL BRING EVIL UPON THIS PLACE AND UPON ITS
INHABITANTS, EVEN ALL THE CURSES THAT ARE WRITTEN IN THE
BOOK THEY HAVE READ BEFORE THE KING OF JUDAH . BECAUSE
THEY HAVE FORSAKEN ME AND OFFERED TO OTHER GODS…”
Hoping to move the populace to repent, Josiah read them
this section of the Torah: [2-Chronicles 34:30] “AND HE READ IN THEIR EARS ALL THE
WORDS OF THE BOOK OF THE COVENANT THAT WAS FOUND IN THE
HOUSE OF THE L-RD.”
Although there are many covenants in the Torah, this
section is called “the Covenant” because they accepted
each curse upon themselves as a punishment foe violating
the Torah. The conclusion of these two chapters affirms
their uniqueness: [Deuteronomy 28:69] “THESE ARE THE WORDS OF THE COVENANT
THE L-RD COMMANDED MOSES TO MAKE WITH THE CHILDREN OF
ISRAEL IN THE LAND OF MOAB, BESIDES THE COVENANT HE MADE
WITH THEM IN HOREB “ [i.e. Sinai]..
It should be noted that of all of the Torah’s commands,
the prohibitions relating to idolatry, were those that
were violated by Josiah’s subjects. [2-CHRONICLES 34:21] “…FOR GREAT IS THE WRATH OF THE
L-RD THAT IS POURED OUT UPON US, BECAUSE OUR FATHERS
HAVE NOT KEPT THE WORD OF THE LORD, TO DO ACCORDING TO
ALL THAT IS WRITTEN IN THIS BOOK.”
It has been claimed that the written Torah (and
consequently, the Oral Tradition) was lost and forgotten
until found by Hilkiah. Any objective study however
would show this to be obviously erroneous. The Torah was
being lived and studied continuously, without
interruption, from time immemorial.
Obviously, during the seven hundred years between Moses
and Josiah, the Jews had innumerable copies of the
Torah. As shown, it was their most treasured possession.
The Torah is also referred to throughout the Hebrew
Bible. For instance, in the same book chronicling the
discovery of this scroll, Deuteronomy 24:16 is quoted
verbatim with regard to Amaziah, who reigned just three
years prior to Josiah: [2-Chronicles 25:3-4] “IT CAME TO PASS, WHEN THE
KINGDOM WAS ESTABLISHED UNTO [Amaziah] THAT HE KILLED
THE SERVANTS WHO HAD SLAIN THE KING, HIS FATHER. BUT HE
DID NOT PUT THEIR CHILDREN TO DEATH; RATHER HE DID
ACCORDING TO THAT WHICH IS WRITTEN IN THE LAW OF THE
BOOK OF MOSES, AS THE L-RD COMMANDED, SAYING, FATHERS
SHALL NOT DIE FOR CHILDREN, NOR SHALL CHILDREN DIE FOR
FATHERS; BUT A MAN SHALL DIE FOR HIS SIN.”
Two men, one Jewish and one a Gentile, arrived late at
night in the emergency room at a hospital. In the
morning the Jewish man donned tefilin and prayed. The
Gentile man was amazed and said to the visiting doctor,
“These Jews are really something. He’s here one night
and already he’s taking his own blood pressure.” These
little boxes and straps were uncovered by archaeologists
thousands of years ago. Hundreds of years before, a
portion of the Oral Tradition had to be put into
writing.
The Torah says [Exodus 13:9] “AND IT SHALL BE AS A SIGN
ON YOUR ARM AND A REMINDER BETWEEN YOUR EYES SO THAT THE
L-RDS TORAH WILL BE IN YOUR MOUTH FOR WITH A STRONG HAND
THE L-RD REMOVED YOU FROM EGYPT .”
Look at [Exodus 13:16 ] – “IT SHALL BE A SIGN UPON YOUR
ARM AND AN ORNAMENT (frontlets) BETWEEN YOUR EYES – FOR
WITH A STRONG HAND G-D TOOK YOU OUT OF EGYPT .”
Deut. 6:8 makes it clear that this is a real time
command. “BIND THEM AS A SIGN UPON YOUR ARM AND LET THEM BE
FRONTLETS BETWEEN YOU EYES.” [Deut. 11:18] – “PLACE THESE WORDS OF MINE” (which
words?). The command says “these words” – quite specific
– so, friend, which words?
The hundreds of Oral laws as to what these tefilin are
and the details explaining their use, have been
faithfully transmitted through the generations. Jewish
people have always accepted these traditions, and today,
3,350 years after the Command was articulated, the laws
of tefillin are still being practiced in their original
fashion.
Because of the terrible persecution and dispersions that
occurred throughout the ages, a danger arose of
forgetting the Oral Law, and the detailed instructions
and explanations contained within – those such as the
commandments surrounding tefillin, as described above.
Thus part of it was written down, first a portion called
the Mishnah, and later, for the same reason, another
portion called the Gemorah. The two together are
referred to as the Talmud. The archaeological find
mentioned above, reveals that the tefilin of yesteryear
are the same as the ones used today. The fact that our
tefilin conform exactly with those of thousands of years
ago is truly profound.
We clearly see that archeological finds sometimes
confirm the continuity of the Biblical Oral Tradition
and how carefully it was preserved and transmitted.
Finds include the uncovering of numerous mikvot – ritual
baths, even from the First Temple times. Once again,
they conform to the rigorous standards of any ultra
orthodox Jew of today. The Bible cryptically says,
“waters bring purity” and that reveres numerous
religious precepts for layman, priests, men, and women
that necessitates a ritual bath for purification. Yet
complete reliance is again placed on the Oral Bible for
the practical real time application of these crucially
important biblical injunctions. Almost no problems have
crept into the Hebrew Bible. We see here even into the
Hebrew Biblical Oral Torah an absence of problems that
would halt or obstruct actual observance of the Bible.
These discoveries of ritual baths, tefillin, etc. have
amazing ramification. They are mind boggling proofs that
the ancient Oral Biblical teachings have been faithfully
kept.
Hershel, the water carrier, had a son who would soon be
Bar Mitzvah, so he went to his friend that he considered
wise, as opposed to going to the town’s local spiritual
leadership. “Tell me, Buddy, how shall I introduce my
son to mysteries of reproduction? He will soon reach an
age of spiritual manhood and it is time he learned about
the ‘birds and the bees.’ “First of all,” replied his
friend, “you must forget about the ‘birds and the bees.’
It is a myth that has no reality, in fact.” “How can you
say that?” asked Hershel. “Because I proved it to my own
satisfaction. I put a bird and a bee together in a cage
and although I watched for a week, I assure you, dear
Hershel, nothing happened.”
People start off with the wrong premises, with
conceptual mistakes, and being overly literal in
context. The results of these logical faults are to
reject the tried and true wisdom of the Oral Torah.
Simple, honest reevaluation would correct their mistaken
conclusions.
Clarifying the Identity of the Lost Ten Tribes and
working to bring them back, is part of the Messianic
Process. We should all do all we can to hasten the
coming of the Messiah. The whole concept of a Messiah is
the concept of a world whose mistaken conclusions can be
rectified, whose conceptual mistakes and out of context
literalness can be fixed.
The Oral law was given together with the Written Law
from the hand of the Almighty G-d of Israel.
Chapter 8
The Calendar
Ancient Oral Torah v. Modern Science
We have cited passages and scholars pointing out the
importance of history and the survival across time, of
the Jews. What, may I ask you, are history and time made
of? One response is the rising and setting of the sun.
The orbit of the moon around the earth, the Earth
around the sun. Years, months, days, hours, minutes, and
seconds are the nitty gritty building blocks of our
earthly time perception. That is exactly what is needed
for every human society in general and for the Jewish
faith community in particular.
All of the timing for the Biblical holidays were
entrusted to the Rabbis. Biblical Law demands that the
month of Aviv (Passover) must occur in the spring and
the month of Tishri, with the harvest festival of
Succoth, must be in fall, hence the necessity for a
solar and lunar calendar.
Deuteronomy 16:1 demands that Passover be in the spring,
‘FOR IN THE MONTH OF SPRINGTIME THE L-RD, YOUR G-D TOOK
YOU OUT OF EGYPT.’ Numbers, 9:1-3 tells us that the
Passover offering needs to be offered on the 14 th day
of the 1 st month (Aviv). “THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL SHALL
MAKE THE PESACH OFFERING IN ITS APPOINTED TIME. ON THE
14TH OF THIS MONTH, IN THE AFTERNOON SHALL YOU MAKE IT,
IN ITS APPOINTED TIME, ACCORDING TO ALL OF ITS DECREES
AND LAWS SHALL YOU MAKE IT.”
Not only the exact style and nature of the offering was
dependent on oral explanation of ‘decrees and laws’, but
the very fixing of the calendar was completely dependent
on our Oral Tradition.
[Ezekiel 13:9]: ‘MY HAND WILL BE AGAINST THE PROPHETS
WHO SEE VANITY AND DIVINE FALSEHOOD. THEY SHALL NOT
SHARE THE SECRET OF MY PEOPLE AND IN THE SCROLL OF THE
FAMILY OF ISRAEL SHALL THEY NOT BE WRITTEN, AND TO THE
LAND OF ISRAEL SHALL THEY NOT ENTER. THEN YOU SHALL KNOW
THAT I AM THE L-RD G-D. THEY SHALL NOT BE IN THE COUNCIL
OF MY PEOPLE…’
“COUNCIL OF MY PEOPLE”: This refers to the Council of
the Calendar Inter-Calculation. When G-d said to Moses
and Aaron, “THIS MONTH SHALL BE FOR YOU THE BEGINNING OF
THE MONTHS”, [Exodus 12:1-2], G-d also transmitted to
them the rules of calculating a new month. How to
establish the year and month were made known to him –
Moses – in order to fulfill the explicit command.
‘Observe the spring month and offer a celebration of the
Passover sacrifice’ (Rosh Hashona 25a). This
necessitated us having both a solar and lunar year.
Jewish months are calculated at 29.53059 days, following
the cycle of the moon. According to the Oral Torah, the
time between one new moon and the next is “29.5 days
plus 793 parts of an hour.” An hour is divided into 1080
parts: 793 Parts of 1080 = 0.734259 0.734259/ 24 = 0.03059
29.5 + 0.03059 = 29.53059
Incredibly, it took the modern world many centuries to
confirm this figure. Only after calculations using solar
satellites, hairline telescopes, laser beams and
super-computers did NASA scientists determine that the
length of the "synodic month," i.e. the time between one
new moon and the next, is 29.530588 days.
Is the point here clear? The Bible orders us to keep the
holidays in a certain way and to establish a calendar.
This command necessitates a tremendous amount of oral
information, including topics in astronomy, maths and
seasons, all of which are not found in the Written Torah
by any regular examination.
Written textual Scriptures contain many references to
the Oral Tradition – where ever the text does not
specify procedures, it is obvious that the Oral Torah
must be relied upon. In Numbers 29:1, it is stated ‘THE
7TH MONTH (again here is our Rabbinically supervised
calendar), ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE MONTH, YOU SHALL HAVE
A HOLY CONVOCATION, YOU SHALL DO NO MANNER OF WORK, IT
IS A DAY OF BLOWING FOR YOU……’ Blowing what? A French
horn? A flute? The answer, my friend is not blowing in
the wind. No, my friend, the answer is flowing in the
Oral Torah. Here it is stated without debate or
contradiction that the Torah is talking about the
Shofar, the ram’s horn. Leviticus 16/31 discusses the
Day of Atonement; “you shall afflict your soul.” That
this refers to fasting and other minor discomforts has
been clearly defined in the Oral Law.
Also, the written Torah tells us to circumcise on the 8
th day. What kind of operation is this? A heart
operation, perhaps? (“And you shall circumcise your
heart”). For heavens sake, we are talking about a
medical procedure that demanded a thorough oral
explanation.
“The Bible, remarkably for its time, notes that the
eighth day after birth is the safest time to perform
circumcisions [Gen. 17:12; Lev. 12:2-3]. When a baby is
born, they have no bacteria in their intestines for the
first few days. By the seventh day, the bacteria
multiply and produce vitamin K. Without vitamin K and
prothrombin protein (which is produced by the liver
using vitamin K), the blood will not clot properly and
the possibility of severe bleeding as well as infection
would make circumcision dangerous in a primitive medical
situation.”
Encyclopedia of Creation Science
But only Oral interpretation could determine the finer
details of this delicate operation even in those
primitive days.
The prophet Zechariah 8:19 lists four fast days that
only are clear to us through the Oral Tradition only. So
said HASHEM, (G-d) of Hosts, ‘the fast of the 4th
(month), the fast of the 5th (month), the fast of the
7th (month), and the fast of the 10th (month) shall be
for the house of Judah for joy and gladness for joyous
holidays, for love, truth and peace.’ Here is an
undisputed prophet mentioning fasts for which knowledge
of the Oral Law was crucial.
For the crucial institution of Sabbath observance again,
you need to check in to understand the matter with the
Oral Tradition. We learn out from the juxtaposition of
prohibition of work next to the work required in the
building of the Tabernacle. We learn of 39 categories of
prohibitive creative work. From these verses emerge the
authoritative definition of work and a Shabbat that has
been kept faithfully without debate, by millions of Jews
for thousands of years.
Chapter 9
Holy Numbers
The following will give you a brief insight into one of
the mysterious levels of understanding G-d’s eternal
Love Letter, the Torah.
I’d like to thank Aish HaTorah’s Discovery booklet for
the form of the wisdom to follow. 7 THE NUMBER 7 is considered one of the most significant
numbers in Judaism: · Shabbat is the 7th day of the week.
· The Sabbatical Year (Shmita) takes place every 7th
year. · When someone passes away, relatives sit “Shiva” in
mourning for 7 days. · At a traditional Jewish wedding, the bride walks
around the groom 7 times. · There are 7 major holidays.
49
THE NUMBER 49, being 7-times-, has great significance in
Judaism. · Between the holidays of Shavuot and Pesach, we “count
the Omer” for seven weeks, or 49 days. · The Jubilee Year occurs after 49 years, following 7
cycles of the 7-year Sabbatical. · The Zohar reports that the spiritual world contains 49
levels of spiritual elevation and decline.
RESEARCH OF IVAN PANIN – MATHEMATICIAN AT HARVARD
UNIVERSITY
Ivan Panin was a Russian immigrant known at the turn of
the century as a brilliant literary figure,
multi-lingual, and a mathematician at Harvard
University. He was also a devout Catholic.
Among the several languages known by Panin, was Hebrew.
The brilliant scholar began studying the Bible in its
original language. Aware of the numerical values of the
Hebrew alphabet, Panin experimented one day by replacing
the letters with their corresponding numbers. Suddenly,
his trained scientific mind picked up an elaborate
mathematical pattern: In the first verse of the Torah
alone, Panin discovered over 50 patterns of the number
seven. According to Panin, the statistical odds of this
pattern being coincidental were one in 33 trillion –
0.00000000000003.
Following this discovery, Panin devoted his entire life
to the study of Bible Numerics, and eventually submitted
to the Nobel Research Foundation over 43,000 sheets of
his research.
In the first verse of the Torah, Prof. Panin found over
50 combinations of “seven.” Below are a few examples.
Number of words in the verse…………………7 (7 x 1) Number of letters in the verse………………….28 (7 x 4) Numeric value of the one verb………...…….…203(7 x 29) Numeric value of the three nouns………………777(7 x 111) Numeric value of first-and-last letters, in the
first-and-last words…………………………………...497(7 x 71) Numeric value of the first-and-last letters of every
word ……………… 1393(7 x 199)
TORAH CODES
Suppose we eliminate all spaces in the Torah, and
consider the text as one long sequence of 304,805
letters. A computer is then instructed to look for
hidden words, encoded at equal skips of letters. For
example, the distance between the letters comprising the
word “HaShoa” (Holocaust) is 49. Statisticians call this
phenomenon ELS – short for “equidistant letter
sequence.”
Once the computer has revealed an encoded word, we then
format the long list of the Torah’s letters into lines,
the length of which graphically depicts best the encoded
word. For example, if a code was found at a skip
sequence of every 49 letters, we would format the Torah
into lines of 50 letters each. No letters are added,
deleted or changed; the new line-length simply enables
us to view the encoded word more easily.
Did you know that we know exactly how many times each
letter appears in the Torah. Take the 5 books of Moses
for example: the letter Yod appears 31,531 times; the
letter vav 30,512 times; the letter hey shows up 28,056
times. Good old alef appears 27,059 times and so on! How
many words are in Aramaic? How many letters appear in a
row? What words and how often do these words repeat
themselves? The longest and shortest words are known.
Words with only two letters are known. Where each word
of a sentence starts with the same letter, and where
each word ends with the same letter. Hey, I almost
forgot something super amazing. Or as we say in Yiddish
and Ladino “.... super kaler fragerlistic
espiealadoshes. If you are standing kindly have a seat.
Take your shoes off, sit a spell [bit] feel at home now,
relax, breathe deeply and easy. Get this, all of the
Torah has been calculated to the n'th degree. What an
amazing picture of internal balance and perfection
emerges! The numerical value of all different verses are
known. One can see and feel conceptual, philosophical,
legal and moral connections between verses, separated by
vast amounts of Scripture. These verses are bound
together by there numerical values as well as by their
idea content. One could write books on this phenomena
alone! By the way, there are about 304,805 letters in
the 5 books of Moses, with 5,845 verses, 79 847 words!
The prophets have 537,500 letters, the Writings have
317,400 letters. That's 1,159,705 letters [give or take
1] in the whole testament the 24 books of the
Hebrew[Jewish] Bible.
Remember if one letter is not
written correctly [according to the ancient Oral Torah]
the Torah Scroll isn't Kosher for public reading and
must be corrected! To the members of the covenantal
faith community, intimate involvement in G-d's Words
bring great joy and meaning. The section we mention
earlier - Leviticus, with the Priest raising his hands,
is the shortest of the 27 chapters in Leviticus. With
859 verses, 1950 words, 44 790 le |